Content on this page is similar to the Now page – it may be rough or “uncut”, and hopefully recent.
This page is about figuring out a “why” or a “compass” – a single sentence that guides what I do. Writing about it in this public place helps me to figure it out and to keep track of how it changes.
August 4, 2022
I’ve now updated this page to “Evolving Research Direction”…and mine right now is this:
Save one course in college as an art major, I am a self-taught computer scientist with a fine arts degree. In my research, I aim to systematically study nontraditional pathways to computing careers, like mine. It was a difficult path, and current efforts to broaden participation in computing are not supporting it. How can broadening participation in computing efforts support nontraditional pathways to computing careers?
…something like that…
July 21, 2022
I’ve renamed this page to “Career Compass”. But maybe it’s more like “Evolving Research Direction”?
I listened to the book Essentialism recently and, while I felt a little exhausted by prescriptive content telling me how to live (which is a switch…I’ve been enjoying that lately), I got a lot out of the book. One thing in particular (essentialism in practice…one thing, you get it) is the part where it talks about big picture missions and visions and that the more specific they are, the better. So, here I’ll try out a more specific career compass and will try not to be too critical of myself (also kind of want to go back to calling this mission now…why was that a problem?).
My “career compass”: I aim to contribute research that equips organizations to hire people without college degrees for computing jobs that have a clear path to further education and career growth…and within that context, study how organizations can facilitate relationship building and solidarity across difference.
Something like that? Probably not specific enough based on the Essentialism parameters, but I will revisit this later.
March 28, 2022
I’ve been listening to Brené Brown’s books, and I had the thought, “I want to be the Brené Brown of computing education for adults,” except for a bit less public. I love the ideas in her research and how she did the research, then created a platform for continuing the research and making it super accessible to the public.
March 16, 2022
My word of the month is “care” because I have not been doing that for myself over the past two weeks. I think the statement below can be updated to:
Vocational training for career changing adults, and within this neoliberal context, discovering methods to care and heal e.g. through relationship building.
Care and healing are resistance. I’m not sure of a specific citation for this idea, but I think the Nap Ministry – Rest is Resistance – is close. This update is also informed by a session I attended at work led by Inspired Heart Healing.
February 25, 2022
I described my research interests in a way that felt good today. It was something like:
Vocational training for career changing adults, and within this neoliberal context, discovering methods of resistance e.g. through relationship building.
I will try out renaming this page to “Compass” and see how it feels.
February 21, 2022
I am confused – I don’t like what I wrote yesterday, and I am questioning the notion of a mission at all. What if my mission was not to have a mission? Who has a “mission”, anyway? Organizations have missions, and I am not an organization. Or am I?
This site used to be, and I guess still is, the home of Lara Schenck L.L.C., my dormant freelance business. What is the difference between Lara Schenck and Lara Schenck L.L.C, and when did this website become about one vs. the other? Is it even possible for this website to represent me as a person, not me as a brand?
The reason I have a “mission” page is that this website is about a brand, not a person. Perhaps this is “whiteness” and market forces in action (see yesterday’s entry for citation and more context). Maybe I’ll start referring to my online self as Lara Schenck L.L.C. to call attention to this phenomenon.
February 20, 2022
A think-aloud as I had some insights this weekend –
I still think the previous phrasing still applies – My mission is to resist and transform the systems of oppression that underlie exclusion from computing – and due to my hungry weekend reading of WWPCDN by Emma Dabiri and my recent acceptance to PhD programs (!!) I feel emboldened to try out naming some of these systems and to phrase the mission more like a working description of a research direction for the next 5-7 years:
My mission is to interrogate* whiteness and/or capitalism through the study of vocational developer training for adults and/or gatekeeping in computing education and/or culture.
I think the “resist” and “transform” pieces of the previous mission statement might be an after graduate school mission…I have to understand a lot more first.
January 26, 2022
I think the previous phrasing still applies – My mission is to resist and transform the systems of oppression that underlie exclusion from computing – but I’m starting to think more about the details. I’m realizing how developer training can fit into this picture. This paper, Engagement in Practice: Teaching Introductory Computer Programming at County Jails, is an example. Restorative justice might be the way to describe it, but this is a topic I don’t fully understand yet.
December 2, 2021
My mission is to resist and transform the systems of oppression that underlie exclusion from computing.
November 15, 2021
My mission is to broaden what “counts” as computing through education, creativity, and social justice.
November 4, 2021
My mission is to broaden access to computing professions and to broaden the perception of what counts as computing.
October 7, 2021
My mission is to discover new mediums for informal learning of computing that will enable more people to discover computing the way I did, on my own terms.
My mission is to broaden the definition of programming so that more people can benefit from the joy of computing.
September 11, 2021
I’m feeling critical of the concept of a mission as I’ve been writing about it here, as my personal goal or something. I guess the idea is to figure out your personal mission, and then find other people with the same mission so you can work on it together. I’m realizing that any mission worth its salt cannot be fulfilled by a single person.
September 8, 2021
My mission is to equip people from marginalized groups with vocational programming skills so they are qualified for developer jobs.
My dream is to have a career where my skills and passions (programming, education, creativity, people) are directed toward improving programming education for the people who need it most, which will in turn, improve programming education for all of us.
July 9, 2021
My mission is to create computer science education methods and technology that are accessible to marginalized communities of adults.
My career dream is to contribute these methods to a vocational computer science curriculum through work with institutions and organizations that provide vocational training and job placement. I will continue to invent new technologies and expand the curriculum content through research.
During graduate school, my dream is to develop conceptual models for programming languages and systems (called notional machines) that can be expressed in analog forms, e.g. games, embodiment, and zines.
June 16, 2021
My mission is to identify the domain-agnostic aspects of computer science that apply across languages, and to make that knowledge accessible to people who learn programming outside of universities.
My dream is to create a computer science curriculum that is accessible to marginalized communities of adults, and delivered to them through a job placement program and support network.
April 2, 2021
I believe there’s a lot of valuable information about computer science that is inaccessible to a great many people, especially to those who arrive at programming from non-traditional paths.
My mission is to create things that inspire programmers to more deeply understand*, appreciate, and contribute to topics in computer science. Phrased another way, I create the learning materials I wish I’d found when I learned about topics I felt afraid of, or topics that I avoided because I deemed they were “not for me”.
* At the end of How to Bake Pi, Eugenia Cheng writes about the “Trinity of Truth” as knowing, believing, and understanding. We have access to so many materials in today’s world that enable us to know about topics in programming, but I believe that there are very few materials that enable us to understand programming. I believe that learning – and life, generally – becomes easier and more enjoyable with understanding. I also believe one of the most important skills in programming – and again, life, generally – is the ability to learn and adapt according to new knowledge (Octavia Butler, Parable of the Sower).